Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update technology/recognition #51

Closed
jomey opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

Update technology/recognition #51

jomey opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jomey
Copy link
Contributor

jomey commented Apr 3, 2024

The logic to updating the team has changed with:
uwhackweek/jupyterbook-template#157

@JessicaS11
Copy link
Contributor

@jomey
Copy link
Contributor Author

jomey commented May 13, 2024

Started this work here: https://github.com/uwhackweek/hackweeks-as-a-service/tree/tech-module

Instead of copying the content - should we link to the README making it more proof to future changes?

@JessicaS11
Copy link
Contributor

should we link to the README making it more proof to future changes?

Absolutely - do we still want to have a series of images to go with the instructions? If so, will we add all of that to the readme?

@jomey
Copy link
Contributor Author

jomey commented May 15, 2024

images to go with the instructions?

Are you thinking of the one image we had that shows how information will show up on a person card?

@JessicaS11
Copy link
Contributor

Are you thinking of the one image we had that shows how information will show up on a person card?

Based on the original content, we had step-by-step text-based instructions with images illustrating the process. I was figuring we'd be updating those to reflect the updated process (but that does potentially make it more cumbersome for a readme).

@jomey
Copy link
Contributor Author

jomey commented May 23, 2024

I think we can find a middle ground between the old and updating the new ReadMe to have some images with instructions.

@scottyhq
Copy link
Contributor

closed by #62

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants