Narrow @ style violations

[KeenWill]

Styler checker flags (list_of_set lt) @ x @ (list_of_set rt) as

Warning:
	using `@` to prepend an element to a list
You wrote:
	 [x] @ (list_of_set rt)
Consider:
	using `::` instead

This is good style though ... Let's keep the style checker from flagging uses of @ lines like this.

[sweirich]

I'd prefer if the style checker did not flag [x] @ xs and tell students to rewrite as x :: xs.

I like to present inorder as (inorder rt) @ [x] @ (inorder rt) to emphasize the symmetry and connection to the other traversals

[KeenWill]

Whoops I had a typo in my comment. It's been updated to say that something of the form list @ [element] @ list is good style that we don't want the style checker to flag (which it currently does).