We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hey guys,
I have seen issue #41 but I have a different case, I have an optional field defined in my model:
model AlertType { id String @id @default(uuid()) name String @unique @db.VarChar(200) description String? @db.VarChar(500) // ... }
And it is generating the following model for it:
// ... @ObjectType() export class Alert { @Field(() => ID, {nullable:false}) id!: string; @Field(() => String, {nullable:false}) title!: string; @Field(() => String, {nullable:true}) description!: string | null; // ... }
I am running into the same issue in my code. Do you think I am missing something? Here is my repo: https://github.com/kasir-barati/graphql/tree/main/apps/botprobe-nest
To reproduce:
pnpm i
nx prisma-generate botprobe-nest
apps/botprobe-nest/src/@generated/alert/alert.model
Anything I can do to make it optional like what happens to the relation fields?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
BTW This did not cause me any trouble in runtime but still it is kinda annoying. Although I am not sure if this is such a bad thing.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hey guys,
I have seen issue #41 but I have a different case, I have an optional field defined in my model:
And it is generating the following model for it:
I am running into the same issue in my code. Do you think I am missing something? Here is my repo: https://github.com/kasir-barati/graphql/tree/main/apps/botprobe-nest
To reproduce:
pnpm i
.nx prisma-generate botprobe-nest
.apps/botprobe-nest/src/@generated/alert/alert.model
.Anything I can do to make it optional like what happens to the relation fields?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: