We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tuono_lib
tuono
It is very weird to use tuono on the frontend and tuono_lib on the backend.
All new tuono projects will add the dependency using tuono and not tuono_lib
// api/health_check.rs use tuono::Request; use tuono::axum::http::StatusCode; #[tuono::api(GET)] pub async fn health_check(_req: Request) -> StatusCode { StatusCode::OK }
With this feature, we:
[dependencies] tuono = { package = "tuono_lib", path = "../../crates/tuono_lib/" }
tuono_lib_macros
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Happy to work on this 👍
Sorry, something went wrong.
@jacobhq It just came in my mind: We should keep the tuono_lib_macros support for both tuono_lib::hanldler and tuono::handler
tuono_lib::hanldler
tuono::handler
jacobhq
No branches or pull requests
Context
It is very weird to use
tuono
on the frontend andtuono_lib
on the backend.Goal
All new
tuono
projects will add the dependency usingtuono
and nottuono_lib
Work breakdown
With this feature, we:
tuono_lib
occurrences in the examples withtuono
tuono
CLI to correctly replace the right strings (add tests)tuono_lib_macros
to correctly inject thetuono
dependencyThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: