-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integrate Thot.Generator with Ionide #34
Comments
Comment by MangelMaxime Are you still ok to integrate Thoth.Json.Generator into Ionide ? What should I do ? I made a quick WIP on my computer by using directly FCS and I am able to retrieve all the information I want from it. So I guess FSAC should also be able to do it. But I am not sure if FSAC maintainers would agree to add such specific code for a library. I thinked about it a lot and had the next idea. We could add an endpoint to FSAC who give by all the types info for a given record:
Having this endpoint in FSAC would help us integrate Thoth.Json.Generator and also also allow me to work on Stub generation at the same time. Both required the same info coming from the records. |
Comment by MangelMaxime Scratch my idea. Both feature will not have the same entry point. For Thoth.Json.Generator I need to find the type definition at |
Comment by Krzysztof-Cieslak Well, I'm the FSAC maintainer so merging in anything shouldn't be a problem ;) But in general I think that having some more "generic" endpoint (like returning all information about given symbol) sounds like good idea - it may be also useful for other features. |
Comment by MangelMaxime
Ah yes that's true. Would you be ok to have tchat on Slack to discuss the feature either for Thoth or "returning all information about given symbol". And I will post a summary of the decision in the open after and start working on the feature. |
Comment by MangelMaxime @Krzysztof-Cieslak To give you a better idea of what Thoth.Json.Generator do (in my head) here is a list of feature. Thoth.Json.Generator features:
For now, we can focus on point 1 only which is the main feature. |
An IDE-agnostic approach would be to use |
Close in favor of #95 (it has the right title in it) ^^ |
Issue by MangelMaxime
Wednesday Apr 11, 2018 at 08:42 GMT
Originally opened as MangelMaxime/Thoth#20
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: