From 648cd8ed1a6671d87d004a4300502bc8013e5cc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 18:27:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Blog PGXN RFC 5

---
 .../post/postgres/pgxn-certifications-rfc.md  | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 content/post/postgres/pgxn-certifications-rfc.md

diff --git a/content/post/postgres/pgxn-certifications-rfc.md b/content/post/postgres/pgxn-certifications-rfc.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8ba3f6e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/post/postgres/pgxn-certifications-rfc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+title: PGXN Certifications RFC
+slug: pgxn-certifications-rfc
+date: 2024-10-09T16:26:48Z
+lastMod: 2024-10-09T16:26:48Z
+description: |
+  A request for comments on a new PGXN RFC for signing releases, plus a link to
+  an initial implementation.
+tags: [Postgres, PGXN, RFC, JWS]
+type: post
+---
+
+A couple weeks ago, I drafted [PGXN RFC–5 — Release Certification], which
+proposes to replace the simple inclusion of a SHA-1 hash digests in PGXN
+release `META.json` files with a [JWS]-signed release payload. From the
+introduction: 
+
+> This RFC therefore proposes to extend [v2] distribution metadata with a
+> single additional property, `certs`, that contains one or more
+> *certifications* that attest to the authenticity or other characteristics of
+> a release on PGXN.
+> 
+> The `certs` value is an object that contains at least one property, `pgxn`,
+> which itself contains a PGXN-generated [RFC 7515][JWS] JSON Web Signature in
+> the [JWS JSON Serialization] format. The `pgxn` property will allow clients
+> not only to assemble the release URL and verify the downloaded file against
+> checksums, but also validate it against a public key provided by PGXN.
+> 
+> The design allows multiple signatures, certifications, or other
+> attestations, which in the future **MAY** allow authors or other entities to
+> sign releases with their own keys. The new format appends a structure such
+> as this to the distribution `META.json` file:
+> 
+> ``` json
+> {
+>   "certs": {
+>     "pgxn": {
+>       "payload": "eyJ1c2VyIjoidGhlb3J5IiwiZGF0ZSI6IjIwMjQtMDktMTNUMTc6MzI6NTVaIiwidXJpIjoiZGlzdC9wYWlyLzAuMS43L3BhaXItMC4xLjcuemlwIiwiZGlnZXN0cyI6eyJzaGE1MTIiOiJiMzUzYjVhODJiM2I1NGU5NWY0YTI4NTllN2EyYmQwNjQ4YWJjYjM1YTdjMzYxMmIxMjZjMmM3NTQzOGZjMmY4ZThlZTFmMTllNjFmMzBmYTU0ZDdiYjY0YmNmMjE3ZWQxMjY0NzIyYjQ5N2JjYjYxM2Y4MmQ3ODc1MTUxNWI2NyJ9fQ",
+>       "signature": "cC4hiUPoj9Eetdgtv3hF80EGrhuB__dzERat0XF9g2VtQgr9PJbu3XOiZj5RZmh7AAuHIm4Bh-rLIARNPvkSjtQBMHlb1L07Qe7K0GarZRmB_eSN9383LcOLn6_dO--xi12jzDwusC-eOkHWEsqtFZESc6BfI7noOPqvhJ1phCnvWh6IeYI2w9QOYEUipUTI8np6LbgGY9Fs98rqVt5AXLIhWkWywlVmtVrBp0igcN_IoypGlUPQGe77Rw"
+>     }
+>   }
+> }
+> ```
+
+Review and feedback would be very much appreciated, especially on the list of
+unresolved questions toward the end.
+
+Thanks to [David Christensen] and [Steven Miller] for the early reviews!
+
+Meanwhile, I've released [pgxn_meta v0.4.0], which adds support for this
+format, as well as code to rewrite PGXN v1 release fields to the new format.
+It doesn't actually do signature verification, yet, as the server back end
+hasn't been updated with the pattern and PKI. But I expect to modify it in
+response to feedback and get it implemented in early 2025.
+
+  [PGXN RFC–5 — Release Certification]: https://github.com/pgxn/rfcs/pull/5
+    "pgxn/rfcs#5 Add RFC for JWS-signing PGXN releases"
+  [JWS]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7515.html "JSON Web Signature (JWS)"
+  [v2]: https://github.com/pgxn/rfcs/pull/3 "pgxn/rfcs#3 PGXN Meta Spec v2"
+  [JWS JSON Serialization]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7515.html#section-7.2
+    "RFC 7515: JWS JSON Serialization"
+  [pgxn_meta v0.4.0]: https://crates.io/crates/pgxn_meta/0.4.0
+    "crates.io: pgxn_meta crate"
+  [David Christensen]: https://www.crunchydata.com/blog/author/david-christensen
+  [Steven Miller]: https://github.com/sjmiller609 "GitHub: Steven Miller"