Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Figure out a way to define SEO meta tags and title for each page in docs #224

Open
rishabhpoddar opened this issue Feb 15, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@rishabhpoddar
Copy link
Member

Enforce that these tags are there at a minimum:

  • title
  • description
  • image
  • URL (added automatically anyway)
  • keywords
  • type (statically add as "website") - TODO: is this supposed to always be website?
@gitcommitshow gitcommitshow added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Jun 9, 2022
@akshat-g-07
Copy link

Hello @rishabhpoddar @gitcommitshow ,
Hope you are doing well.

I wanted to know if the issue is still open as I wanted to contribute to the same.

As per my understanding, if the documents are in .doc or .docx format then my approach to this issue is to create a python script which reads through all the docs in one go and raise some smoke signal/red flag if any of the given tags are absent.

If the document format is different or on some cloud platform please let me know the details of the same. Will try to figure out something. Though as per my belief, python should be able to come rescue in any case (would like to explore new worlds if not).

Thanks :)

@akshat-g-07
Copy link

Hey,

I just went through few things and got to know that the docs are in v2 folder.
And most of the files there are .mdx.

So presuming that those are the docs to work upon, I think readmdict library of python might help.

Please let me know if I am coming in right direction or not.

Thanks:)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants