-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nomenclature Changes #4
Comments
I'll start working on converting the current config files to use the YAML list format you discuss in your email; let me know when you resolve the above and I'll update them again with those changes. |
Okay, cool, I've changed $ git branch -m master main
$ git push -u origin main Then you'll just need to change the default branch on GitHub and delete the now-superfluous I've raised a PR for changing the notation for the keywords here: #7. In the end I decided I didn't like double-underscores, mainly because they meant that the actual text of the keyword lines up with indented keys on the next line, which didn't help with readability as much as I'd hoped. The PR uses Apart from the |
Alright, my fork should be all up to date. That sounds good to me! Just give me a heads up with your changes and I can update the config files. I commented with the all-clear on #7 as well! |
Update my main version with the new config files
@gmoore016
Changing the main branch for the repo:
I'd like to change the name of the branch from
master
→main
-- I'm going through and doing this for all my repos, but it might cause a issue with your fork, and I don't want to create extra problems for you. If you're willing to update the remote-tracking origins on your fork, I can send you command line instructions. Other options include making sure your additions are merged upstream and then nuking your repo and re-forking, or just leaving it as it is, for now at least.Changing some of the keywords in the YAML config:
Now that these affordances are maturing a little, the initial keywords I chose don't seem terribly helpful, and I was thinking it might be good to replace them with something a bit more semantically useful. Something like this, perhaps?
enum_type
→constant_value
?enum_map
→value_map
?Or perhaps you have better ideas? Suggestions or other feedback very welcome!
Distinguishing keys (XPath expressions) from keywords:
Looking at the YAML files I think they'd be more readable if the (burgeoning vocabulary of) keywords were easier to distinguish from the XPath expressions that serve as the keys to the XML files.
__keyword__
?KEYWORD
?_keyword
?I think I'm leaning towards
__KEYWORD__
, actually, so that something likewould become:
I'd welcome your input on whether this represents an improvement or not!
Feel free to respond here or on email if you have anything you'd like to comment on.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: