Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mobile compatibility #29

Open
wacko141za opened this issue Jan 27, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Mobile compatibility #29

wacko141za opened this issue Jan 27, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@wacko141za
Copy link

Changing of base layer and overlays on map is not possible

Opening the options menu is met with significant difficulty, only to reach a list of options that do not respond to touch

(Tested on wind-dev)

@jammin84
Copy link
Contributor

@wacko141za what phone/tablet/etc did you use?

I could change layers on a HTC one. But it didn't display overlays as you've mentioned. i.e. nodes/links/etc.

It may be best that maps aren't shown for mobiles as I think the openlayers.org plugin may need upgrading from V2 to V3 for this to function usefully.

@wacko141za
Copy link
Author

I tested using Chrome on a Samsung Galaxy S5

@wacko141za
Copy link
Author

I've just noticed another issue on mobile.
screenshot_2016-01-28-10-49-47

Wind home page and Network nodes pages scale properly, but node pages do not

@jammin84
Copy link
Contributor

The real solution here is a total re-write with a responsive design.

Ideally the menu/ header / footer should disappear by becoming a small button on smaller screens.

But doubtful anyone has this kind of time/effort.

@wacko141za
Copy link
Author

Sorry for being a hassle. Its just that often when I am out doing a node survey or an install, I will be constantly referring to wind on my phone. (It worked flawlessly on our previous version of wind)

@jammin84
Copy link
Contributor

@wacko141za i agree it should be mobile friendly. I, and I'm sure many others do the same 😉

@spinza
Copy link
Contributor

spinza commented Jan 28, 2016

@wacko141za It wasn't flawless but yeah it worked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants