-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 543
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[process] Add output of 'ps auxfwww' #3707
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Add output of 'ps auxfwww' Resolves: sosreport#3706 Signed-off-by: Jose Castillo <[email protected]>
Congratulations! One of the builds has completed. 🍾 You can install the built RPMs by following these steps:
Please note that the RPMs should be used only in a testing environment. |
Not sure where to discuss the issue/PR, if here or in #3706 .
Can't combination of |
@casantos mentioned in the RFE that:
I take it that the current outputs don't help in these specific cases, but maybe he can offer a specific example where or why the current captures don't help. |
Here are two examples, using a GNOME session running through a VNC service.
It is much easier to identify what processs belong to systemd service ( |
We should not extend the current command by the forest option, since there are tools analysing the current output and they would be broken (as they expect binary / cmd name as 11th word in a line). We can add a new Pros: users investigating GUI issues will see process details in forest-like view more easily (no need to merge outputs of other Negs: one extra command to execute on every @TurboTurtle and @arif-ali , what is your opinion? I am on torn.. |
pstree does not identify the process user owner.
I agree. A new
|
Add output of 'ps auxfwww'
Resolves: #3706
Please place an 'X' inside each '[]' to confirm you adhere to our Contributor Guidelines