Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

static analysis +formal verification of rbpf #625

Open
shenghaoyuan opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

static analysis +formal verification of rbpf #625

shenghaoyuan opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@shenghaoyuan
Copy link

Hello,
This is not a regular issue but more like some suggestions.

I have some plans to improve the current rbpf vm, I would like to know if the rbpf community is also interested in those topics.

  • do some dataflow analysis based on the existing static_analysis.rs (e.g. the verified C Compiler CompCert 's Kildall algorithm), and integrates into the verifier workflow
  • or enhance the current verifier.rs following the Linux eBPF verifier (e.g. the value tracking), plus some formal verification efforts on the new verifier.
@Lichtso
Copy link

Lichtso commented Oct 28, 2024

Yes, we are interested in expanding static analysis, especially using BTF (see solana-labs/solana#29863), but never got around implementing it.

Furthermore, there is also interest in porting the program verifier to BPF itself, so that it can be deployed on-chain.

@shenghaoyuan
Copy link
Author

thx, I got it. I will feedback here once I make some progress

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants