You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we arbitrarily remove AMRs that are less than half the gap limit in size. We reference this as a "hack that has produced excellent results" in the manual, but our conversation about hmr today got me thinking about size cutoffs.
Is it possible to implement something like hmr's size distribution/quantile cutoff approach in amrfinder? Would it be more appropriate?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just realized that Fang has suggested a merging step for AMRs. She called those regions generated by amrfinder "partial AMRs" because they are very fragmented. Here's the command she sent me for merging AMRs.
This is definitely something that should be standardized and hasn't been taken care of yet. @sarahsma when you are around next, let's talk about how it could be done.
Currently we arbitrarily remove AMRs that are less than half the gap limit in size. We reference this as a "hack that has produced excellent results" in the manual, but our conversation about
hmr
today got me thinking about size cutoffs.Is it possible to implement something like
hmr
's size distribution/quantile cutoff approach inamrfinder
? Would it be more appropriate?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: