Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NF flow_table runtime #242

Open
Yongeverhuang opened this issue Jun 28, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

NF flow_table runtime #242

Yongeverhuang opened this issue Jun 28, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@Yongeverhuang
Copy link

Feature Request

In this way, when i want to set differert traffic flows forward to different NF. I found that flow_table NF could set service chain rules to get the function. But when start the flow_table NF. It could not get SDN ring or preforming tx stats in ‘stdout’, anything else need to implement or some wrong operations???
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I have an issue when [...]

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen. Add any considered drawbacks.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Documentation, Integration Strategy
If you can, explain how users will be able to use this and possibly write out a version the docs.
Maybe a screenshot or design?

@bdevierno1
Copy link
Contributor

When you run the flow table NF do you have to manually kill the process? If so it could be due to a bug here where it is caught in an infinite loop searching for an available core.
#243 uses onvm's flow table api to set rules and then perform a lookup to forward packets out of a port. This could possibly be modified to set service rules for a different NF.

@Yongeverhuang
Copy link
Author

Yongeverhuang commented Jun 30, 2020

@bdevierno1 hello, it is true that when I encountered the flowtable does not work properly and needs to kill the process.But the NF you mentioned, I tested it seems like flows through ports forwarding, it doesn't match the service chain according to the rules.For example, I have deployed 4 NFs, the default order is 1(NF)->2->3->4, now I want to match a rule to make a certain flow through 2(NF)->4->1 ->3. In fact, it should be needed SDN controller deployment and management rules, NF flowtable also mentioned using a certain [IP: port] demonstrate controller management, but this does not refer to the document guidance. How about make an example?

@bdevierno1
Copy link
Contributor

Hi I've created an example in #248. Let me know if this is similar to what you were looking for or if I can be of any further help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants