You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to have the possibility to access the data (coefficients, lhs/rhs, etc.) of different constraint types, e.g., cons_knapsack (cons_linear is there already). This would be interesting after presolving.
In principle, this seems easy to do and I can provide a first draft. Are there any obstacles concerning the usage of transformed variables?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello again, @pfetsch! I had a draft PR (#935) that, among other things, allowed getting the lhs/rhs of nonlinear constraints, as now it only allows linear and quadratic. Your PR would be greatly appreciated.
What's your idea for doing this? If you (nearly) exclusively use SCIP functions, no problems should arise.
There's no obstacles on handling transformed variables. They're handled in the same Variable class and work exactly like in SCIP. (A lot of functions have an original or transformed flag to cover both cases)
It would be nice to have the possibility to access the data (coefficients, lhs/rhs, etc.) of different constraint types, e.g.,
cons_knapsack
(cons_linear
is there already). This would be interesting after presolving.In principle, this seems easy to do and I can provide a first draft. Are there any obstacles concerning the usage of transformed variables?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: