You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 6, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hi I am currently trying to forecast a the power usage of a portfolio. This portfolio is made up of 1000 sites. I have fitted 1000 MARS models to this data, regularized using Elastic Net. Normally this works well.
Sometimes I have missing data over parts of my phase space. This means that sometimes the MARS model produces ridiculously numbers (sometimes) over this range. MARS can obviously extrapolate with a polynomial and the model will be poorly constrained in this region.
As I am aggregating the 1000 models the chance of this happening in one of them isn't insignificant. Currently I look at the min and max y values and limit the output by some multiple of this. This stops a site producing ridiculous numbers but smaller errors are hard for me to see.
Do we have any way of testing how volatile MARS is at a given point in phase space? I'm also not totally sure what I would do with the prediction if i found this to be true. Any ideas
Many thanks
Simon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi I am currently trying to forecast a the power usage of a portfolio. This portfolio is made up of 1000 sites. I have fitted 1000 MARS models to this data, regularized using Elastic Net. Normally this works well.
Sometimes I have missing data over parts of my phase space. This means that sometimes the MARS model produces ridiculously numbers (sometimes) over this range. MARS can obviously extrapolate with a polynomial and the model will be poorly constrained in this region.
As I am aggregating the 1000 models the chance of this happening in one of them isn't insignificant. Currently I look at the min and max y values and limit the output by some multiple of this. This stops a site producing ridiculous numbers but smaller errors are hard for me to see.
Do we have any way of testing how volatile MARS is at a given point in phase space? I'm also not totally sure what I would do with the prediction if i found this to be true. Any ideas
Many thanks
Simon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: