We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should BIP21 be used in this case? we see some benefits since the bitcoin scheme is recognized, where lightning: is not.
lightning:
Should it be:
bitcoin:?lightning=${invoice} // or can we put `null` as the bitcoin address?
or
bitcoin://?lightning=${invoice}
Unforunately the support right now seems less than the number of wallets that support lightning:lnbc... links
lightning:lnbc...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@rolznz good question. Funny, because this came up in discussion on the BIP for human readable payment instructions over DNS. See Matt's comment.
There is now a PR to BIP21 discussing this here.
We should let discussion play out in that BIP, then update this site accordingly.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Should BIP21 be used in this case? we see some benefits since the bitcoin scheme is recognized, where
lightning:
is not.Should it be:
or
Unforunately the support right now seems less than the number of wallets that support
lightning:lnbc...
linksThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: