You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I find that genes with frameshift mutations are often treated as pangenome elements. Is there a way to correct for this? For example, if 32 of 90 strains carry gene X with an insertion that causes a frameshift mutation, I found that the Roary output will indicate that 90 strains carry gene X, but 32 strains carry an additional gene Y as part of the genome, even though gene Y is a truncated version of gene X.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I find that genes with frameshift mutations are often treated as pangenome elements. Is there a way to correct for this? For example, if 32 of 90 strains carry gene X with an insertion that causes a frameshift mutation, I found that the Roary output will indicate that 90 strains carry gene X, but 32 strains carry an additional gene Y as part of the genome, even though gene Y is a truncated version of gene X.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: