Is it possible to have different getter and setter types to the property field?

[RichardInnocent]

Let's say I have this class...

@Entity
public class Foo {

  @Property
  private final AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0);

  public void setCount(int value) {
    count.set(value);
  }

  public int getCount() {
    return count.get();
  }
}

At the moment, this throws a NoAccessorMethodException: Class ... requires a public accessor method for field count when saving.

Is it possible to "ignore" the field type and save like this? Exposing an AtomicInteger setter breaks abstraction (and thread safety in this case).