Replies: 2 comments
-
Normally yes |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
AFAIK, there's not much do do. Either you
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Using ArrayD here is a must, but I have to implement a trait that should only work for Array2 types, is checking the dimensions in every function the way to go? I am not sure If I could do some trait bounds in order to eliminate checking the dimensions in every function implemented.
Also, is there any performance gain in converting to Array2 before calling other
ArrayBase
functions in this case?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions