Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Custom global allocators (RFC 1398, RFC 1974) #287

Open
1 of 2 tasks
matthewjasper opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 2 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

Custom global allocators (RFC 1398, RFC 1974) #287

matthewjasper opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
RFC Stabilization Docs Documentation required for stabilizing a feature
Milestone
Rust 2018

Comments

@matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor

matthewjasper commented Apr 3, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Custom allocators are mostly a library feature, but #[global_allocator] is not. See rust-lang/rust#27389 rust-lang/rust#32838, rust-lang/rust#42774.

  • Global allocator attribute - stub
  • Maybe add Alloc as a special trait
@matthewjasper matthewjasper added S-waiting-on-stabilization Waiting for a stabilization PR to be merged in the main Rust repository RFC Stabilization Docs Documentation required for stabilizing a feature labels Apr 3, 2018
@matthewjasper matthewjasper added this to the Rust 2018 milestone Apr 3, 2018
@alercah
Copy link
Contributor

alercah commented Apr 4, 2018

I think you have that backwards? #[global_allocator] is the language feature, right?

@Havvy
Copy link
Contributor

Havvy commented Aug 3, 2018

This feature is stable now. There's a stub of documentation in attributes.md.

@ehuss ehuss removed the S-waiting-on-stabilization Waiting for a stabilization PR to be merged in the main Rust repository label Dec 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
RFC Stabilization Docs Documentation required for stabilizing a feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Rust 2018
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@ehuss @Havvy @matthewjasper @alercah