You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just wonder, if RPM could provide some facilities to create the directory structure in more flexible way.
Currently, the filesystem package in Fedora has ~1MB. That is quite a lot. Installing the package, it probably consumes even more inodes. I just wonder, if there was a way for RPM to know that the package owns some directory, but actually not create them immediately, unless they have some content.
Apart from filesystem package, I can imagine that could help for example SCLs, where we have to replicate the filesystem package, but the replica is incomplete and it is even more problematic considering speed [1] and occupied space.
This discussion was converted from issue #780 on April 14, 2022 10:54.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I just wonder, if RPM could provide some facilities to create the directory structure in more flexible way.
Currently, the filesystem package in Fedora has ~1MB. That is quite a lot. Installing the package, it probably consumes even more inodes. I just wonder, if there was a way for RPM to know that the package owns some directory, but actually not create them immediately, unless they have some content.
Apart from filesystem package, I can imagine that could help for example SCLs, where we have to replicate the filesystem package, but the replica is incomplete and it is even more problematic considering speed [1] and occupied space.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions