-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bug: NA returned by get_uid when using division_filter #909
Comments
For completeness, I tested a second genus, Paracoccus, and got the same bug. Looks like that one also prefers the second row. Maybe I can try |
Hi Ed! So the issue is that the division is technically called "high G+C Gram-positive bacteria" for whatever reason. You can see that when you run it without a division filter:
Note that the input to
Note that |
Ah I figured it was a regex but I didn't realize that it was like I think having a flag (e.g. full=TRUE) by default could be fine, then I can set it to full=FALSE for my usage. That way folks can choose how it works. Might make sense to let folks know it's a regex as well in the first place (maybe that's documented and I didn't see it). Cheers |
Running into a strange bug. I'm querying some various bacterial taxa, and a handful of my taxa have conflicting genus names in the database, e.g. Rhocococcus.
I attempted to resolve this issue using the
division_filter
option, but then I realized I was still getting NA returned.I tried to solve using the
rows =
option, but I don't think I can depend on a particular row being the proper one. Here, the second row is what I want.The odd thing is that the function returns somewhat as expected with the
division_filter = "bacteria"
, yet the returned value isNA
.Session Info
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: