Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Run: one Giappo param setting with range of NS epsilons #294

Closed
1 task
richelbilderbeek opened this issue Sep 13, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed
1 task

Run: one Giappo param setting with range of NS epsilons #294

richelbilderbeek opened this issue Sep 13, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees
@richelbilderbeek
Labels
depends Cannot do, due to dependency on another issue upstream Problem is upstream

Comments

@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Owner

richelbilderbeek commented Sep 13, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Depends on:

I can do that with mcbette.

I quote from the NS code what epsilon is: 'stopping criterion: smallest change in ML estimate to accept'

Created https://github.com/richelbilderbeek/pirouette_example_27
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek self-assigned this Sep 13, 2019
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek changed the title Check differeent epsilons in Nested MCMC runs Check different epsilons in Nested MCMC runs Sep 18, 2019
richelbilderbeek pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 8, 2019
Progress #294
0cd6399
@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Owner Author

First results:

epsilon n_particles marg_log_lik marg_log_lik_sd
1e-02 1 -140.8959 1.494570
1e+00 1 -140.8959 1.494570
1e+02 1 -140.8959 1.494570
1e-02 2 -144.3754 1.061399
1e+00 2 -144.3754 1.061399
1e+02 2 -144.3754 1.061399

@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Owner Author

Wider range:

epsilon n_particles marg_log_lik marg_log_lik_sd
0e+00 1 -140.5560 1.4980871
1e+00 1 -140.8959 1.4945700
1e+08 1 -140.8959 1.4945700
0e+00 2 -143.1778 0.9373183
1e+00 2 -144.3754 1.0613990
1e+08 2 -144.3754 1.0613990
0e+00 4 -146.0222 1.1542024
1e+00 4 -145.9139 1.1144357
1e+08 4 -145.9139 1.1144357

@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek added the medium Medium priority issue label Oct 15, 2019
@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Owner Author

Added to schedule (#303)

@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek removed the medium Medium priority issue label Jan 23, 2020
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek mentioned this issue Jan 23, 2020
Closed
2 tasks
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek changed the title Check different epsilons in Nested MCMC runs Run: one Giappo param setting with range of NS epsilons Jan 23, 2020
@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Owner Author

Epsilon never seems to matter, see my Issue here

@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek added depends Cannot do, due to dependency on another issue upstream Problem is upstream labels Jan 30, 2020
@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Owner Author

It's fine as it is 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek

Labels
depends Cannot do, due to dependency on another issue upstream Problem is upstream
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@richelbilderbeek