Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Tags for Packagist #14

Open
gordonbanderson opened this issue Jan 20, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Update Tags for Packagist #14

gordonbanderson opened this issue Jan 20, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@gordonbanderson
Copy link
Collaborator

The newest semantic version tag 2.0 is out of date with the current master branch, I'd prefer not to have to use dev-master. Could the current version be tagged with 2.1?

@gordonbanderson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The tag 2.0 was added on 23/12/2014 so that's over a year without a composer update semver wise.

@micschk
Copy link
Member

micschk commented Jan 20, 2016

@gordonbanderson, I have lots of small tweaks of this module locally -- haven't had te time yet to properly update Git. Also, I have yet to take some time to look into SemVer... I've just given you push access, please go ahead and make the changes you require.

@gordonbanderson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Regarding SemVer it took me a little while to get my head into it but it's actually quite simple.

If a version is likes of 2.0.0 then it will change as follows:

  • 2.0.1 - a bug fix has been made on the 2.0.0 version. No functionality changes
  • 2.1.0 - functionality has been enhanced, but in a backwards compatible non breaking manner (this is the change I was wanting to make which prompted this issue)
  • 3.0.0 - new functionality is added that is not backwards compatible.

I can then do ```composer require "micschk/silverstripe-liveseo:~2" and provided semver is adhered to, whenever I update I know I will be updating to a version that is backwards compatible, i.e. things should not break :)

BTW I do not have rights to

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants