crossref:
in includes seem to completely overwrite that of main file
#7895
Labels
support
a request for support
Bug description
Not very important, but having a
crossref:
in a sub-document with any setting will completely disregard all crossref-settings in the "mother document". Is this intentional? I could not find this issue in the Crossref Overhaul-list or elsewhere. Persists in today's build.It is not a very common situation as one typically would want to address all such settings in the mother document anyway. I discovered it after a while because a chapter co-author had inserted
list-title:
to fix a local "issue". As an "editor" I think I would prefer a warning or even an error instead of silently ignoring it.P.S. Impressed by your big bite on open issues recently, from 1100+ to 877. 👍
Steps to reproduce
Mother document:
test1.qmd:
test2.qmd:
Expected behavior
Either the typical approach (child document only oversteering mother doc for the given setting, otherwise inheritance),
or a warning/error if there is no forseeable future where one would want to do this with crossref.
Actual behavior
Your environment
Quarto check output
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: