Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Critical Issue and apk not build with pusher-channels-flutter on Flutter 3.24.0 #174

Open
razuahmed75 opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@razuahmed75
Copy link

FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.

  • What went wrong:
    Execution failed for task ':pusher_channels_flutter:verifyReleaseResources'.

A failure occurred while executing com.android.build.gradle.tasks.VerifyLibraryResourcesTask$Action
Android resource linking failed
ERROR:/Users/bugfinder/Downloads/bug-finder-project/PAYSECURE-APP/paysecure/build/pusher_channels_flutter/intermediates/merged_res/release/values/values.xml:194: AAPT: error: resource android:attr/lStar not found.

I'm reaching out to report an issue with the pusher-channels-flutter package while trying to build an APK on Flutter 3.24.0. Unfortunately, the build is currently failing, and it appears to be due to compatibility issues with the latest Flutter version. I have tried troubleshooting, but the problem seems to persist.

Given how widely this package is used, I would highly recommend looking into this issue and providing a fix. It would greatly help many developers, including myself, who rely on this package for production environments.

@ryansyah17
Copy link

Launching lib\main.dart on sdk gphone16k x86 64 in debug mode...

FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.

  • What went wrong:
    A problem occurred configuring project ':pusher_channels_flutter'.

Could not create an instance of type com.android.build.api.variant.impl.LibraryVariantBuilderImpl.
Namespace not specified. Specify a namespace in the module's build file. See https://d.android.com/r/tools/upgrade-assistant/set-namespace for information about setting the namespace.

 If you've specified the package attribute in the source AndroidManifest.xml, you can use the AGP Upgrade Assistant to migrate to the namespace value in the build file. Refer to https://d.android.com/r/tools/upgrade-assistant/agp-upgrade-assistant for general information about using the AGP Upgrade Assistant.
  • Try:

Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace.
Run with --info or --debug option to get more log output.
Run with --scan to get full insights.
Get more help at https://help.gradle.org.

BUILD FAILED in 1s
Error: Gradle task assembleDebug failed with exit code 1

Exited (1).

@jim-2000
Copy link

Using pusher_channels_flutter from GitHub

To use the pusher_channels_flutter package in your Flutter project, you can add it directly from the GitHub repository.

Option 1: Regular Dependency

Add the following to your pubspec.yaml under dependencies:

dependencies:
  flutter:
    sdk: flutter
  pusher_channels_flutter:
    git:
      url: https://github.com/ArmanKT/pusher-channels-flutter.git
      ref: master

or 
dependency_overrides:
  pusher_channels_flutter:
    git:
      url: https://github.com/ArmanKT/pusher-channels-flutter.git
      ref: master

@ysushah
Copy link

ysushah commented Oct 27, 2024

FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
[ +2 ms] * What went wrong:
[ ] Execution failed for task ':pusher_channels_flutter:verifyReleaseResources'.
[ ] > A failure occurred while executing com.android.build.gradle.tasks.VerifyLibraryResourcesTask$Action
[ ] > Android resource linking failed
[ +1 ms] ERROR:D:\SAMIRBHAI\e-school-saas-main\build\pusher_channels_flutter\intermediates\merged_res\release\values\values.xml:194: AAPT: error: resource android:attr/lStar not found.
[ +1 ms] * Try:
[ ] > Run with --debug option to get more log output.
[ +1 ms] > Run with --scan to get full insights.
[ ] * Exception is:
[ ] org.gradle.api.tasks.TaskExecutionException: Execution failed for task ':pusher_channels_flutter:verifyReleaseResources'.
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.lambda$executeIfValid$1(ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.java:147)
[ +1 ms] at org.gradle.internal.Try$Failure.ifSuccessfulOrElse(Try.java:282)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.executeIfValid(ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.java:145)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.execute(ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.java:133)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.CleanupStaleOutputsExecuter.execute(CleanupStaleOutputsExecuter.java:77)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.FinalizePropertiesTaskExecuter.execute(FinalizePropertiesTaskExecuter.java:46)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ResolveTaskExecutionModeExecuter.execute(ResolveTaskExecutionModeExecuter.java:51)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.SkipTaskWithNoActionsExecuter.execute(SkipTaskWithNoActionsExecuter.java:57)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.SkipOnlyIfTaskExecuter.execute(SkipOnlyIfTaskExecuter.java:56)
[ +1 ms] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.CatchExceptionTaskExecuter.execute(CatchExceptionTaskExecuter.java:36)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.EventFiringTaskExecuter$1.executeTask(EventFiringTaskExecuter.java:77)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.EventFiringTaskExecuter$1.call(EventFiringTaskExecuter.java:55)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.EventFiringTaskExecuter$1.call(EventFiringTaskExecuter.java:52)
[ ] at org.gradle.internal.operations.DefaultBuildOperationRunner$CallableBuildOperationWorker.execute(DefaultBuildOperationRunner.java:204)
[ +10 ms] at org.gradle.internal.operations.DefaultBuildOperationRunner$CallableBuildOperationWorker.execute(DefaultBuildOperationRunner.java:199)
[ +1 ms] at org.gradle.internal.operations.DefaultBuildOperationRunner$2.execute(DefaultBuildOperationRunner.java:66)
[ ] at org.gradle.internal.operations.DefaultBuildOperationRunner$2.execute(DefaultBuildOperationRunner.java:59)
[ ] at org.gradle.internal.operations.DefaultBuildOperationRunner.execute(DefaultBuildOperationRunner.java:157)
[ ] at org.gradle.internal.operations.DefaultBuildOperationRunner.execute(DefaultBuildOperationRunner.java:59)
[ ] at org.gradle.internal.operations.DefaultBuildOperationRunner.call(DefaultBuildOperationRunner.java:53)
[ ] at org.gradle.internal.operations.DefaultBuildOperationExecutor.call(DefaultBuildOperationExecutor.java:73)
[ ] at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.EventFiringTaskExecuter.execute(EventFiringTaskExecuter.java:52)
[ +1 ms] at org.gradle.execution.plan.LocalTaskNodeExecutor.execute(LocalTaskNodeExecutor.java:74)
[ ] at org.gradle.execution.taskgraph.DefaultTaskExecutionGraph$InvokeNodeExecutorsAction.execute(DefaultTaskExecutionGraph.java:333)
[ ] at org.gradle.execution.taskgraph.DefaultTaskExecutionGraph$InvokeNodeExecutorsAction.execute(DefaultTaskExecutionGraph.java:320)
[ ] at org.gradle.execution.taskgraph.DefaultTaskExecutionGraph$BuildOperationAwareExecutionAction.execute(DefaultTaskExecutionGraph.java:313)
[ ] at org.gradle.execution.taskgraph.DefaultTaskExecutionGraph$BuildOperationAwareExecutionAction.execute(DefaultTaskExecutionGraph.java:299)
[ +5 ms] at org.gradle.execution.plan.DefaultPlanExecutor$ExecutorWorker.lambda$run$0(DefaultPlanExecutor.java:143)
[ +2 ms] at org.gradle.execution.plan.DefaultPlanExecutor$ExecutorWorker.execute(DefaultPlanExecutor.java:227)
[ +11 ms] at org.gradle.execution.plan.DefaultPlanExecutor$ExecutorWorker.executeNextNode(DefaultPlanExecutor.java:218)
[ +14 ms] at org.gradle.execution.plan.DefaultPlanExecutor$ExecutorWorker.run(DefaultPlanExecutor.java:140)

I'm reaching out to report an issue with the pusher-channels-flutter package while trying to build an APK on Flutter Unfortunately, the build is currently failing, and it appears to be due to compatibility issues with the latest Flutter version. I have tried troubleshooting, but the problem seems to persist.

Given how widely this package is used, I would highly recommend looking into this issue and providing a fix. It would greatly help many developers, including myself, who rely on this package for production environments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants