Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add OIDC support to Authenticate Workloads for ESC #402

Open
dirien opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Add OIDC support to Authenticate Workloads for ESC #402

dirien opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Improvements or new features
Milestone

Comments

@dirien
Copy link

dirien commented Oct 9, 2024

Hello!

Currently, when using for example the ESC SDK you need to provide the PAT to your program to connect to your different environments. This is fine for most scenarios.

But there is always the risk to accidentally leak the PAT giving a potential malicious actor access to a whole lot of environments.

What would be really awesome, would be to have an additional way to authentiacte, in form of OIDC and workload identity. Similar Vault or infisical is doing!

Extending then the SDKs to handle the authentication process including the fetching of identity tokens for the user.

  • Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction
  • If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)
@dirien dirien added kind/enhancement Improvements or new features needs-triage Needs attention from the triage team labels Oct 9, 2024
@dirien dirien changed the title Add OIDC support to Authenticate Workloads Add OIDC support to Authenticate Workloads for ESC Oct 9, 2024
@thoward
Copy link
Contributor

thoward commented Oct 9, 2024

See additional discussion on motivation for this issue here: pulumi/docs#13054 (review)

@cleverguy25 cleverguy25 removed the needs-triage Needs attention from the triage team label Oct 10, 2024
@cleverguy25 cleverguy25 added this to the 0.113 milestone Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Improvements or new features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants