You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The current Bayesian Monte Carlo (BMC) implementation does not support hyper-parameter optimization. Thus, it is of little practical value right now.
Describe the solution you'd like.
It would be great if the GP-model could fit it's kernel hyper-parameters e.g. by ML type II.
Additional context
I suppose it' not clear yet how gradients are computed in ProbNum which are needed to optimize the marginal likelihood to obtain the optimal hyper-parameters. I suppose that is a blocker for this Issue. So mainly opening this Issue for visibility in case someone uses BMC already.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The current Bayesian Monte Carlo (BMC) implementation does not support hyper-parameter optimization. Thus, it is of little practical value right now.
Describe the solution you'd like.
It would be great if the GP-model could fit it's kernel hyper-parameters e.g. by ML type II.
Additional context
I suppose it' not clear yet how gradients are computed in ProbNum which are needed to optimize the marginal likelihood to obtain the optimal hyper-parameters. I suppose that is a blocker for this Issue. So mainly opening this Issue for visibility in case someone uses BMC already.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: