Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regularization methods: Why no LASSO ? #34

Open
mamadyonline opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Regularization methods: Why no LASSO ? #34

mamadyonline opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mamadyonline
Copy link

Hello,

Thank you very much for this library. I am loving using it for my current project.

I was wondering why there is no L1 regularization proposed in the methods ? Since it is "simpler" than the other methods, is there any rationale no to have in the library ? Could it be possible to have it ?

Thank you in advance.

@powerfulbean powerfulbean added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 19, 2024
@powerfulbean powerfulbean self-assigned this Jul 19, 2024
@powerfulbean
Copy link
Owner

Hi @mamadyonline,

Thank you very much for your attention on this library! I will look into adding this feature and keep you posted.

Best regards,
Jin

@mamadyonline
Copy link
Author

Hi @powerfulbean,

That would be super nice. Thank you for your quick reaction. And I am looking forward.

Best regards,
Mamady

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants