-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
compatibility with Pods new "LINK" Type field #20
Comments
Hi @reachadam - would need a bit more information, first did you check your Preview Location setting? |
Yes, pulls in all other fields just fine, just not the URL. I can do an animated gif to make it easy. |
Does this help? See how when I try to connect a URL it doesn't give me the options https://db.tt/DXaTdEBWM9 |
and you have extended the post with a field of type: website? |
There is a relationship with a CPT named reviews. Posts have a relationship field named Product. The website URL is in the Review post that I am linking the blog post too. You see the name and all other custom fields in reviews pull in fine. I think it may be how PODS creates a URL custom field where you are forced to have link text. |
Or when there is a URL, the integration doesn't give you the option to use a custom field from the relationship. It doesn't even have the relationship as an option. |
That's strange - traversal to related items should work the same for both cases - can you share your Configuration or have a login for me? - Will Take a closer look tomorrow! |
Sure I will, its on a localhost so I will send you the login via FB |
Pods Introduce an new Field Type Link - Related to pods-framework/pods#2655 change filter to include new field Type and take care of the output! |
Using 2.7 of PODS
When trying to connect to a URL field that was created with PODS, the integration can seem to find the URL field. See
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: