Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change helpText for "model" radio button group #78

Closed
pixelzoom opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Change helpText for "model" radio button group #78

pixelzoom opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@pixelzoom
Copy link
Contributor

In #67 (comment), @terracoda said:

Atomic Model radiogroup on screen 1
@DianaTavares, upon a closer look, I see "Classical" and "Quantum" flow for the models. Would it make sense to capture that representation in the help text?
Screenshot 2024-11-06 at 15 42 01

  • I propose changing: Choose atomic model to explore.
  • To something like these:
    • Choose from a range of classical and quantum models to explore.
    • Explore a range of classical and quantum models.
@pixelzoom
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is related to the helpText of the radio button group used to choose the model. The helpText is currently “Choose atomic model to explore.” While there is a Classical/Quantum continuum in the Specta screen, there is no continuum in the Energy Levels screen — all of the models are quantum. My understanding is that the current language was chosen to work for both screens. So if you go down this path, we’ll need to customize the helpText per screen -- more development time, more strings to translate. My recommendation is to leave it as is.

@pixelzoom pixelzoom changed the title Help text for "model" radio button group Change helpText for "model" radio button group Nov 7, 2024
@pixelzoom
Copy link
Contributor Author

11/7/24 design meeting: @DianaTavares @arouinfar @kathy-phet @terracoda @LindaStegemann @ariel-phet @KatieWoe @pixelzoom

@arouinfar We make the classical/quantum distinction in the screen summary, so favor a generic description here. Consensus was no change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants