Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sprint review 8.1.25: Alex presentation of development design #1805

Open
cmarooney-stfc opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@cmarooney-stfc
Copy link
Collaborator

cmarooney-stfc commented Jan 9, 2025

FORMULATION IN PROGRESS - NOT COMPLETE

Alex presented how his current developments are integrated. The tickets under consideration are

Discussion details:

Problems identified with hashing

From #1789, hashing now only deals with the contents of serializable, and the hash object is now given a tolerance as in equal_to_tol. This practice was approved in the merging of #1789 but was not liked by the other participants in this meeting.

ACTION: Chris to review the approval process for #1789 and create a ticket to review if this practice should continue.

It was also noted that run_id is not hashable in this ticket as not contributing to the uniqueness of the object. Again this was thought suprising and in need of review.

ACTION: Alex to find existing ticket number on run_id, and if not available, make a new one.

The equal_to_tol issue #1147 appeared at points in this discussion, but at the close it seemed to be agreed that its substance was not relevant to the other items discussed. It should however be clarified. Hence

ACTION: Alex to make a ticket to write devdocs for #1147.

ACTION: Alex to make a separate ticket to replace eq_to_tol type names with equal_to_tol conforming with the existing usage.

Toby and Alex agreed to discuss the multifit/covariance issue #1798 offline.

Time prevented moving on to discuss #1791 and Alex has subsequently been asked to arrange a follow on meeting to deal with that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant