Thumbnail image does not match image on the page linked to it.

[skilfullycurled]

I might be using the application incorrectly but here goes. I have successfully processed and saved images, and when I go to the homepage, there's a thumbnail of the image as I thought I had saved it. However, when you click on the link contained in the image to go to the larger version, I only get a preprocessed image without the color map applied.

Thumbnail from homepage: http://infragram.org/upload/1407860128034_img_0581.jpg_thumb.jpg
Link to page with saved image: http://infragram.org/i/53ea3de40ab503231b000c36

[jywarren]

I believe this can happen when the browser fails to process the
infragrammar commands on the image. We should perhaps store a static
version of the final image too -- this could make things a lot more
reliable on varying browser setups. Was this image done in the legacy
interface? Does this bug vary between legacy and new interfaces?

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:32 PM, skilfullycurled [email protected]
wrote:

I might be using the application incorrectly but here goes. I have
successfully processed and saved images, and when I go to the homepage,
there's a thumbnail of the image as I thought I had saved it. However, when
you click on the link contained in the image to go to the larger version, I
only get a preprocessed image without the color map applied.

Thumbnail from homepage:
http://infragram.org/upload/1407860128034_img_0581.jpg_thumb.jpg
Link to page with saved image:
http://infragram.org/i/53ea3de40ab503231b000c36

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#67.

[skilfullycurled]

Yes and no (and the yes is not the type of differentiation you are looking for).

Yes: Uploading, processing, and saving an image using the legacy site creates the thumbnail but when you click on the thumbnail, the image does not render neither on Firefox 31.0 nor Safari 5.1.7.

No: When you open up web inspector, the image has been downloaded, and that image is not of the processed version. Perhaps that's because the infragrammer hasn't been applied yet, I'm not sure how that works.

For my own clarification, with regard to the infragrammer, are you saying that the image that is downloaded should be the unprocessed version, and that the infragrammer takes care of making it render as the processed version?

[jywarren]

Yes the infragrammer is not applied yet, you got it. Have u been able to
test if the new interface does this?
On Aug 13, 2014 1:47 PM, "skilfullycurled" [email protected] wrote:

Yes and no (and the yes is not the type of differentiation you are looking
for).

Yes: Uploading, processing, and saving an image using the legacy site
creates the thumbnail but when you click on the thumbnail, the image does
not render neither on Firefox 31.0 nor Safari 5.1.7.

No: When you open up web inspector, the image has been downloaded, and
that image is not of the processed version. Perhaps that's because the
infragrammer hasn't been applied yet, I'm not sure how that works.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#67 (comment).

[skilfullycurled]

I'm not following you. I believe I encountered the issue on the new interface originally. What's the link to the new interface?

[jywarren]

I'm trying to tell if the issue affects both the new and old interfaces, or
is just to do with the old interface. The new one is linked to from the
front page, and is at http://infragram.org/sandbox/

Thanks!

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:53 PM, skilfullycurled [email protected]
wrote:

I'm not following you. I believe I encountered the issue on the new
interface originally. What's the link to the new interface?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#67 (comment).

[skilfullycurled]

I think the original issue was from using the newer interface. Here's another one I just created using the link you just provided and there's still the same problem.

http://infragram.org/i/53ebe4200ab503231b000c3c