Replies: 6 comments 3 replies
-
cC.: @LukasHirt, @pascalwengerter, @kulmann, @individual-it, @phil-davis |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just to point it out: this is only about unit tests, there are also integration and acceptance tests in web, that would still stay in the And that is also the only slight disadvantage I can think of the proposal. Will people be confused to find some tests (integration/acceptance) in the generally I don't have any strong opinions about where the unit tests should live, as long as its uniform across the project we would need to add these items into the model above:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
another point that came to my mind a second ago while writing tests.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have the same thoughts as @individual-it regarding having 2/3 tests in dedicated folder and rest next to files. What adds a bit to the confusion then is again as pointed out already that the What I am also considering is, how do we then make clear separation what is integration test and what is unit test? Integration test behave a lot like unit tests - they are directly tied to a component. They are also called |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
what to do next with this discussion? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We've decided to go with a dedicated |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In Web currently we use two places where tests are located.
We need to discuss and then decide what location fits best.
I'd like to propose following:
this brings following benefits:
other projects that do it that way:
history:
misc
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions