You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Basically, the law1 says issuers can’t email/mail investors based on the TA contact information for anything other than a proxy campaign. I’ve heard some murmurings these last few weeks of potential disdain from this, and wanted to have a productive dialogue around everyone’s perspectives! 🫱🏼🫲🏽 So, what do you think, do you want any 'ol (marketing) communication from companies you've invested with? 🤔
Footnotes
I can make the precise legal citations if you’d like (it’s circa the electronic delivery rules). But I sort of wanted to keep this chat higher-level since it’s in the Org discussions. I would cite it if we were talking about explicit policy recommendations in the SEC-Comments repo. ↩
Should issuers be able to directly email their investors?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Basically, the law1 says issuers can’t email/mail investors based on the TA contact information for anything other than a proxy campaign. I’ve heard some murmurings these last few weeks of potential disdain from this, and wanted to have a productive dialogue around everyone’s perspectives! 🫱🏼🫲🏽 So, what do you think, do you want any 'ol (marketing) communication from companies you've invested with? 🤔
Footnotes
I can make the precise legal citations if you’d like (it’s circa the electronic delivery rules). But I sort of wanted to keep this chat higher-level since it’s in the Org discussions. I would cite it if we were talking about explicit policy recommendations in the SEC-Comments repo. ↩
1 vote ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions