A quick note about the lesson reviews

[seanlip]

Hi everyone!

Firstly, I hope your submissions are going well -- it's been great to see so many awesome reviews and skill table ideas. Thank you for taking the time to submit them, and I hope that you've been enjoying the process of crafting them!

I just wanted to mention one thing for the "review document" part of the contributions. In general, I've only looked at the review document for a single lesson -- but one thing we'll be looking at fairly closely during applications is the other 4+ documents that weren't reviewed. So, I would advise focusing on trying to ensure that those other documents fulfill the criteria that were noted in the reviews -- e.g. having specific "negative notes", being specific about the changes, having enough examples, considering broader impacts of the change, etc. This is likely to end up being more useful than repeatedly polishing the first document until it gets a stellar review (though I'm definitely still happy to review repeat submissions multiple times if it helps clarify the feedback).

I hope this helps you focus your contributions a bit more (for the "review" part), if you haven't done the above already. All the best, and we look forward to receiving your final applications later this week!

Thanks,
Sean

[F-ibi]

Very well received and noted.

Thank you @seanlip and @AllanYangZhou .

You've been great mentors to us all.

[SelinamNKPE]

Well noted @seanlip and @AllanYangZhou
Thank youuu

[infosecmentor]

Thankyou

[MrMatt64]

How likely is there to be an extension after today. Found observations am yet to document in the addition and subtraction lesson.