You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We'd like to migrate to Ethers for our client-side library to interact with the Ethereum blockchain. We believe this will provide a more stable experience for our users.
Basic Pros
Smaller uncompressed size
Outpacing Web3.js in weekly downloads
Many tests written
Some people report it being more stable
More frequent releases
Basic downsides
Single project maintainer
Fewer "Contributors"
Younger than Web3.
Relies on backers. Not backed by a non-profit like Web3.js is (Ethereum Foundation).
Some of our devs using Ethers in other projects have noted we have experienced more stable WalletConnect connections and also transaction responses.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We'd like to migrate to Ethers for our client-side library to interact with the Ethereum blockchain. We believe this will provide a more stable experience for our users.
Basic Pros
Basic downsides
Some of our devs using Ethers in other projects have noted we have experienced more stable WalletConnect connections and also transaction responses.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: