-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: eo-tides: Tide modelling tools for large-scale satellite Earth observation analysis #7700
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 🚨 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: Tide Model Driver for MATLAB pyDeltaRCM: a flexible numerical delta model xeofs: Comprehensive EOF analysis in Python with xarray ExoTETHyS: Tools for Exoplanetary Transits around host stars OceanSpy: A Python package to facilitate ocean model data analysis and visualization |
Hi @robbibt and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:
In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them. |
Please reduce to length of your paper to up to about 1000 words. Paper format information here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/paper.html. You can check paper length (and a few other items) with the command |
@editorialbot commands |
Hello @robbibt, here are the things you can ask me to do:
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
Thanks @kthyng, I'll work on this now. |
@editorialbot check repository |
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info:
✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
@editorialbot check repository |
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info:
✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
@editorialbot check repository |
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info:
✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
Hi @kthyng, I've significantly reduced the length of the paper by approximately half: from 2625 to 1480 words. I've made sure that the "summary" and "statement of need" are within the requested limit (the remainder is a brief snapshot of the package's key features). I've also fixed up the referencing issues highlighted above. Here are some suggestions for reviewers with expertise in coastal Python package development:
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: Tide Model Driver for MATLAB xeofs: Comprehensive EOF analysis in Python with xarray OceanSpy: A Python package to facilitate ocean model data analysis and visualization sandpyper: A Python package for UAV-SfM beach volumetric and behavioural analysis pyDeltaRCM: a flexible numerical delta model |
@robbibt I appreciate the magnitude of words you've removed, but please do get down to about 1000 words. I'd recommend moving the more detailed sections about how to use the software into documentation. |
@pdebuyl Could you edit this submission? It's almost ready, though the author still needs to reduce the paper length some before starting. |
@editorialbot invite @pdebuyl as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
Thanks @kthyng, and apologies for the hassle here: I was basing my submission on this previous JOSS paper which has a word count of around 3400 words, so I didn't know how strictly the word limit was applied: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06683 I'll try and reduce it a little further. We do have more detailed content in our docs, but I was really hoping to keep at least a brief summary of the main features and some of our figures to help articulate how the different parts of the package fit together. |
Ah, yeah we have started to enforce the word limit now, but that's confusing for people who have submitted before. Sorry about that. If you think it's really helpful to be in there you can go up to maybe 1200 words, but it may go up during review too. |
@editorialbot check repository |
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Submitting author: @robbibt (Robbi Bishop-Taylor)
Repository: https://github.com/GeoscienceAustralia/eo-tides
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 0.5.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @robbibt. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@robbibt if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: