[PRE REVIEW]: QuantizedSystemSolver: A discontinuous ODE system 2 solver for Julia.

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @mongibellili (elmongi elbellili)
Repository: https://github.com/mongibellili/QuantizedSystemSolver.jl
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.1
Editor: @diehlpk
Reviewers: @joshuaeh, @lamBOOO
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f779f8dbd5bcd59e354eb9dddda30eac"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f779f8dbd5bcd59e354eb9dddda30eac/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f779f8dbd5bcd59e354eb9dddda30eac/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f779f8dbd5bcd59e354eb9dddda30eac)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mongibellili. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mongibellili if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.2557003 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: MacroTools.jl
- No DOI given, and none found for title: SymEngine.jl
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Improving linearly implicit quantized state system...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.32 s (487.1 files/s, 88841.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                          113           3139           6663          15801
JavaScript                       4            137            182            879
Markdown                        12            114              0            615
HTML                             9             52              0            272
TOML                             3             59              1            238
YAML                             7              6              9            230
TeX                              1              1              0             36
CSS                              6              1             13              6
JSON                             1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           156           3509           6868          18078
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    56	Mongi Bellili
    33	mongi bellili
    33	mongibellili
     1	Daan Huybrechs

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 656

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

WorldDynamics.jl: A Julia Package for Developing and Simulating Integrated Assessment Models
Submitting author: @aurorarossi
Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active)
Reviewers: @ranocha, @StanczakDominik, @miguelraz
Similarity score: 0.7597

OpenGeoSysUncertaintyQuantification.jl: a Julia library implementing an uncertainty quantification toolbox for OpenGeoSys
Submitting author: @baxmittens
Handling editor: @kanishkan91 (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @dannys4
Similarity score: 0.7590

DynamicalBilliards.jl: An easy-to-use, modular and extendable Julia package for Dynamical Billiard systems in two dimensions.
Submitting author: @Datseris
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @ahwillia
Similarity score: 0.7552

QAOA.jl: Toolkit for the Quantum and Mean-Field Approximate Optimization Algorithms
Submitting author: @timbode
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @babreu-ncsa, @pkairys, @Abinashbunty
Similarity score: 0.7532

DynamicOED.jl: A Julia package for solving optimum experimental design problems
Submitting author: @AlCap23
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @KBodolai, @joshuaeh
Similarity score: 0.7495

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

👋 @mongibellili - thanks for your submission. Can I ask about the fact that your paper has three authors, but your repository shows almost entirely your commits, with one very small commit from one of the other authors?

[mongibellili]

Greetings, Sure. Both collaborators are my advisors, and I receive help from them offline. thanks, mongi

…

________________________________ From: Daniel S. Katz ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2024 12:47 AM To: openjournals/joss-reviews ***@***.***> Cc: Mongi Bellili ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: QuantizedSystemSolver: A discontinuous ODE system 2 solver for Julia. (Issue #7156) 👋 @mongibellili<https://github.com/mongibellili> - thanks for your submission. Can I ask about the fact that your paper has three authors, but your repository shows almost entirely your commits, with one very small commit from one of the other authors? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#7156 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOFAMBAPLJE2N246GCQ3FPLZTZOP5AVCNFSM6AAAAABNJIVBW6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMJWGQZDANBTHE>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[danielskatz]

👋 @diehlpk - Would you be able to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @diehlpk as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[diehlpk]

@danielskatz Yes, I will have a look in two weeks after traveling.

[danielskatz]

Can I assign it to you now?

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @diehlpk as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @diehlpk is now the editor

[diehlpk]

Can I assign it to you now?

I assigned it right now. Starbucks WiFi seems not to be stable.

[diehlpk]

Hi @aurorarossi do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @baxmittens do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @Datseris do you have time to review this paper?

[Datseris]

Sorry, I am completely out of time.

[baxmittens]

Sorry for answering that late. I missed that email.
This is way out of my expertise so that I would decline this one.

[aurorarossi]

Sorry for taking so long to reply, but I'm not available to review this.

[diehlpk]

Hi @timbode do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @AlCap23 do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

hi @joshuaeh do you have time to review this paper?

[joshuaeh]

hi @joshuaeh do you have time to review this paper?

Sure, I can

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @joshuaeh as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@joshuaeh added to the reviewers list!

[diehlpk]

@mongibellili could you please recommend some potential reviewers?

[mongibellili]

Sure, I searched for all with "julia" and "numerical analysis", and removed those working on many other specific fields. I found these reviewers:
-Edenhofer
-rafaelbailo
-DanielVandH
-lucaferranti
-lamBOOO
-ManuelBehrendt
-vlc1
-victorapm
-dannys4
-RahulSundar
-mvaldes
-cmsmlab
-EdwardBerman
-simone-silvestri
-ChrisRackauckas
-josemanuel22
-ajinkyakadu
-sandreza
-ziyixi
-hemanthgrylls
-joeybernard
-mseri

[diehlpk]

Hi @Edenhofer do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @rafaelbailo do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @DanielVandH do you have time to review this paper?

[rafaelbailo]

Sorry @diehlpk, I don't have time at the moment.

[Edenhofer]

Unfortunately, I must decline to review the submission. I do not think I have the necessary expertise in the area of the submission to adequately evaluate it.

[DanielVandH]

Sorry for the late reply. Unfortunately I do not have the time currently.

[diehlpk]

Hi @lucaferranti do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @lamBOOO do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @ManuelBehrendt do you have time to review this paper?

[lamBOOO]

Hi @lamBOOO do you have time to review this paper?

Yes, I can do that.

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @lamBOOO as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@lamBOOO added to the reviewers list!

[diehlpk]

@joshuaeh, @lamBOOO thanks for agreeing to review.

I will start the review soon.

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7434.