Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Geospatial Datatypes and Functions in the Most Popular Databases Survey #609

Open
ar-chad opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@ar-chad
Copy link
Collaborator

ar-chad commented Jan 9, 2025

Bellow is the result of my survey of geospatial databases, discussed on 08/01/2025 WG meeting, in a form of links to lists of the geo and spatial datatypes and functions supported by the most known databases of this kind. There is too many of them to put on a list here.

Maybe such list of datatypes and functions could be compiled based on those sources in the future and used for benchmarks of geospatial databases. At first glance, it looks like there are still 2D and 3D functions present in those databases and not in GeoSPARQL yet.

There are also other well known databases with geospatial support, but not easy to find online documentation:

  • Teradata Vantage
  • Microsoft SQL Server
  • SAN HANA
@ar-chad ar-chad added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 9, 2025
@situx
Copy link
Collaborator

situx commented Jan 9, 2025

I think it would be great if we had a table that would compare the functions that are implemented in the databases, similarly to table F.3 in the GeoSPARQL 1.1 standard.
Then we could filter out common functions in all databases which are probably also the one's we might want to define for GeoSPARQL

@ar-chad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ar-chad commented Jan 9, 2025

OK, I'll work on this.

@ar-chad ar-chad self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants