Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"Pour" is parsed as an ingredient in "Tomates (148 g pour 100 g)" #3820

Open
Tracked by #9096
aleene opened this issue Jul 8, 2020 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #9096

"Pour" is parsed as an ingredient in "Tomates (148 g pour 100 g)" #3820

aleene opened this issue Jul 8, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
🥗🔍 Ingredients analysis https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Ingredients_Extraction_and_Analysis ⏰ Stale This issue hasn't seen activity in a while. You can try documenting more to unblock it.

Comments

@aleene
Copy link
Contributor

aleene commented Jul 8, 2020 •
edited by teolemon
Loading

Describe the bug
Results in pour as an ingredient.

https://be.openfoodfacts.org/product/87157246/tomato-ketchup-heinz

Part of
@aleene aleene added the 🐛 bug This is a bug, not a feature request. label Jul 8, 2020
@svensven svensven added the 🥗🔍 Ingredients analysis https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Ingredients_Extraction_and_Analysis label Aug 28, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ⏰ Stale This issue hasn't seen activity in a while. You can try documenting more to unblock it. label Jan 14, 2021
@teolemon teolemon removed the ⏰ Stale This issue hasn't seen activity in a while. You can try documenting more to unblock it. label Jul 19, 2021
@teolemon teolemon changed the title Tomates (148 g pour 100 g) "Pour" is parsed as an ingredient in "Tomates (148 g pour 100 g)" Jul 19, 2021
@teolemon teolemon moved this to To do in Ingredient analysis Jun 25, 2022
@teolemon teolemon mentioned this issue Oct 12, 2022
Open
@teolemon teolemon mentioned this issue Oct 2, 2023
Open
1 task
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been open 90 days with no activity. Can you give it a little love by linking it to a parent issue, adding relevant labels and projets, creating a mockup if applicable, adding code pointers from https://github.com/openfoodfacts/openfoodfacts-server/blob/main/.github/labeler.yml, giving it a priority, editing the original issue to have a more comprehensive description… Thank you very much for your contribution to 🍊 Open Food Facts

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ⏰ Stale This issue hasn't seen activity in a while. You can try documenting more to unblock it. label Feb 21, 2024
@teolemon teolemon moved this to To discuss and validate in 🍊 Open Food Facts Server issues Apr 23, 2024
@teolemon teolemon removed the 🐛 bug This is a bug, not a feature request. label Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🥗🔍 Ingredients analysis https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Ingredients_Extraction_and_Analysis ⏰ Stale This issue hasn't seen activity in a while. You can try documenting more to unblock it.
Projects
Ingredient analysis
Status: To do
🍊 Open Food Facts Server issues
Status: To discuss and validate
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@aleene @teolemon @svensven