You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I check out the Lemma A.1 in the paper but the derivation at the $4^{th}$ equality sign ("=") seems not correct since you when you put $f(x,y)$ inside the integral $\int_{x'}$, you cannot change the index $x$ in $f(x,y)$ into the index $x'$ as in $f(x',y)$. Such a change does not lead to an equivalent expression. Would you mind checking it out?
Furthermore, the lemma claims it is true under suitable regularity conditions. So what is that suitable regularity conditions?
Thank Chen,
Bests,
-Thanh
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Chen,
I check out the Lemma A.1 in the paper but the derivation at the$4^{th}$ equality sign ("=") seems not correct since you when you put $f(x,y)$ inside the integral $\int_{x'}$ , you cannot change the index $x$ in $f(x,y)$ into the index $x'$ as in $f(x',y)$ . Such a change does not lead to an equivalent expression. Would you mind checking it out?
Furthermore, the lemma claims it is true under suitable regularity conditions. So what is that suitable regularity conditions?
Thank Chen,
Bests,
-Thanh
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: