-
Please briefly describe your problem and what output you expect. If you have a question, please don't use this form. Please include a minimal reproducible example (AKA a reprex). If you've never heard of a reprex before, start by reading https://www.tidyverse.org/help/#reprex. Brief description of the problemHello, I'm doing some deconvolution analysis with Immunedeconv package embedded function for CIBERSORT deconvolution. The source code and LM22 has been extracted from CIBERSORT itself. However, I realised the results from Immunedeconv gives me P value 9999 and there is no parameter function to annotate desired permutation under immunedeconv (apart from array, absolute and absolute_method). The p value results also vary when I try to run using web server for CIBERSORT. Any ideas why or able to reproduce the same results, but using local R server? Thanks! # insert reprex here Versions[Paste the output of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
Both That said, I believe that it's a more valid approach to derive p-values by comparing immune cell fractions between two groups of samples, e.g. using a linear model. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Both
deconvolute
anddeconvolute_cibersort
use the...
parameter, so you should be able to pass arbitrary arguments to the original CIBERSORT function, including something likeperm=1000
.That said, I believe that it's a more valid approach to derive p-values by comparing immune cell fractions between two groups of samples, e.g. using a linear model.