Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 25, 2019. It is now read-only.

update button does not save settings for HID powersploit attack #121

Closed
thesle3p opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

update button does not save settings for HID powersploit attack #121

thesle3p opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@thesle3p
Copy link

so the most recent update to the nethunter app for what ever reason does not save the configuration for powersploit or does not load it at run time because upon exiting and restarting the app the fields are not repopulated.

@binkybear binkybear added the bug label Jan 28, 2016
@binkybear
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm debating if this is really a bug or not because we previously would save the configuration into the powershell exploit itself. However, because we have to pass the shellcode now separate we don't save those settings in the ps1 file. Before regex would be used in the exploit to get those settings but we don't do that anymore.

I think it might be more of an enhancement at this point but I will let others chime in.

@thesle3p
Copy link
Author

Why not have the shell code saved to a file when generated then read and
piped out to invoke shellcode? I bring this up because on a red team
engagement you don't always have time to sit around and wait for
shellcode to be generated, especially if you are compromising multiple
systems in a row.

On 01/28/2016 07:01 PM, binkybear wrote:

I'm debating if this is really a bug or not because we previously
would save the configuration into the powershell exploit itself.
However, because we have to pass the shellcode now separate we don't
save those settings in the ps1 file. Before regex would be used in the
exploit to get those settings but we don't do that anymore.

I think it might be more of an enhancement at this point but I will
let others chime in.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#121 (comment).

@binkybear
Copy link
Collaborator

Ha! Just noticed we had the same type of idea. Going to mark this duplicate for now since we are already discussing it in #114 (comment)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants