You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
Since the arrow from addressbookparser to view command points to the name of viewcommand, one would think that it is calling the constructor. Thus, shouldn't the box be attached to the viewcommand class name?
On further inspection, the same issue can be applied to the sequence diagram of other commands as well.
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
Since the arrow from addressbookparser to view command points to the name of viewcommand, one would think that it is calling the constructor. Thus, shouldn't the box be attached to the viewcommand class name?
On further inspection, the same issue can be applied to the sequence diagram of other commands as well.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2223S2/pe-interim#4671] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: