You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We want the blueprints to own the configuration of the system.
For a MOS gateway, the ID of the gateway is defined at the root level of the gateway, which blueprints are not able to configure.
For playout gateway, there are various boolean options at the root level which control some behaviour of the gateway, these have suboptimal defaults that cannot be changed by the blueprints.
Proposal
I do not have a proposed solution, I am looking for ideas on how this should be solved.
Process
The Sofie Team will evaluate this RFC and open up a discussion about it, usually within a week.
RFC created
Sofie Team has evaluated the RFC
A workshop has been planned
RFC has been discussed in a workshop
A conclusion has been reached, see comments in thread
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Could this potentially be a task for system blueprints? Maybe they could provide callbacks to return defaults for a first connection of a PeripheralDevice? Or even every connection, and "onPeripheralDeviceConnected" callback - if it were async, one could imagine a sort-of DHCP setup, where the System Blueprint could query a central command server for what these settings should be, and then that system could make the decision. Perhaps it would then make sense to expose some environment variables to the System Blueprint to make identifying instances easier.
About Me
This RFC is posted on behalf of the BBC
Use Case
We want the blueprints to own the configuration of the system.
For a MOS gateway, the ID of the gateway is defined at the root level of the gateway, which blueprints are not able to configure.
For playout gateway, there are various boolean options at the root level which control some behaviour of the gateway, these have suboptimal defaults that cannot be changed by the blueprints.
Proposal
I do not have a proposed solution, I am looking for ideas on how this should be solved.
Process
The Sofie Team will evaluate this RFC and open up a discussion about it, usually within a week.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: