Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate thickness mapping issues #73

Open
cmeyer opened this issue Jan 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate thickness mapping issues #73

cmeyer opened this issue Jan 16, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@cmeyer
Copy link
Contributor

cmeyer commented Jan 16, 2023

ND:

I tried the thickness mapping on [redacted], it really has artifacts making it
look ugly. See attached

None of the artifacts show up if you just display the ZLP intensity or
the loss intensity.

So it seems that the artifact source is from changing which channels are
used for the ZLP extraction from pixel to pixel, see attached image, as
things get thicker you presumably start using more channels as being
part of the ZLP, and when you add one channel more gets counted as ZLP
making for a discrete jump down in thickness.

So if you just make the channel choice global processing is 1000x
faster, and the map will look much better.

image

Ref: email 2021-04-20.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant