-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
All/Unread Results grouped by source - not a bug it seems #782
Comments
AFAIK nothing even related to that code changed. Could you get some real examples where the order is incorrect? |
Experimenting with the update interval is made more difficult by #775 - the settings don't stick, adding them manually to the database does not make a difference so I changed the default (in |
Yea it's not a bug an people have found this before, really old actually #51 |
Hm, that's ancient. I'll see if I can find some time to fix it, it is rather annoying. |
thanks @Yetangitu , @Grotax and @SMillerDev I am experiencing the same sorting / order issue, let me know if I can help testing |
It's not really a bug, the sorting is just not based on the article date. This grouping happens because the feed fetcher starts feed by feed to request the updates and places them in the dB. Then the reader API will simply fetch them in the order they were added to the dB. Currently and for a long time nobody wanted to work on this. Might also have some performance implications I guess |
A recent update - 14.2.0 most likely - changed the sorting order for results in the All Articles and Unread Articles sections. Before the change these results were sorted chronologically without grouping, after the change they are grouped by source in loosely clustered batches. Like this, somewhat:
Before:
After:
Results in subcategories are still sorted chronologically. I had a quick look at recent changes but have not yet found the culprit. If this change is intentional I think it should be possible to revert to the original - chronological - behaviour since that makes way more sense than the current rather messy presentation. If it is not, this is a bug.
I'm using PostgreSQL, for the rest my installation is rather standard. There are no 'issues' in the admin settings, everything seems to be the way it is supposed to be.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: