-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FreeRDP 2.x support (or 3.x) #1338
Comments
See also: #1075 and #1083 (comment) |
@metalefty |
FreeRDP has released version 2.0 and have published a new release policy on their website: ~1 major release every year with >= 2 years of bugfixes. I'm assuming that means predictable API churn. |
Wouldn't it make sense if xrdp could rely on the FreeRDP protocol implementation? |
Is this work still going on? |
We haven't abandoned it, but nothing is going on due to a lack of development resources. |
Xrdp is too old,Freerdp has been updated to version 3,but xrdp is still based on Freerdp 1.0 |
@RyanCode Can you help us? |
Sure, after I've been busy for a while,perhaps it is possible to upgrade the proxy module client to the latest freerdp client,there's many developer hope that proxy programs have more detailed audit functions, such as recording and real-time playback.But this feature is relatively commercial and may not be a good choice for open-source programs |
@RyanCode |
@Mr-LZG what is related to this topic? |
my bad i thought it's for XRDP support. |
You should raise your own new issue if need help. |
done thanks! |
I'm planning to add FreeRDP 2.0 support on xrdp. We have NeurtinoRDP in RDP-RDP mode. NeutrinoRDP is a fork of FreeRDP 1.0 for proprietary use and a little bit outdated because it is based on 1.0.
NeutrinoRDP has some security issues like #1083 and also has lots of bugs fixed in FreeRDP. It is better letting users use FreeRDP 2.0 rather than NeutrinoRDP. I'm thinking like this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: