-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UI proof of concept #65
Comments
I framed the results using the following frame: {
"@context": {
"nde": "https://www.netwerkdigitaalerfgoed.nl/def#",
"prov": "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#",
"schema": "https://schema.org/",
"void": "http://rdfs.org/ns/void#",
"xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#",
"classPartition": "void:classPartition",
"class": { "@id": "void:class", "@type": "@id"},
"entities": { "@id": "void:entities", "@type": "xsd:integer" },
"propertyPartition": "void:propertyPartition",
"distinctValues": { "@id": "void:distinctObjects", "@type": "xsd:integer" },
"property": { "@id": "void:property", "@type": "@id"},
"dataDump": "void:dataDump",
"distinctSubjects": { "@id": "void:distinctSubjects", "@type": "xsd:integer" },
"properties": { "@id": "void:properties", "@type": "xsd:integer" },
"sparqlEndpoint": { "@id": "void:sparqlEndpoint", "@type": "@id"},
"triples": { "@id": "void:triples", "@type": "xsd:integer" },
"dateModified": { "@id": "schema:dateModified", "@type": "xsd:dateTime" },
"contentSize": { "@id": "schema:contentSize", "@type": "xsd:integer" },
"vocabularies": { "@id": "void:vocabulary", "@type": "@id", "@container": "@set"},
"wasGeneratedBy": "prov:wasGeneratedBy",
"Activity": "prov:Activity",
"startedAtTime": { "@id": "prov:startedAtTime", "@type": "xsd:dateTime" },
"endedAtTime": { "@id": "prov:endedAtTime", "@type": "xsd:dateTime" },
"distinctValuesLiteral": { "@id": "nde:distinctObjectsLiteral", "@type": "xsd:integer" },
"distinctValuesURI": { "@id": "nde:distinctObjectsURI", "@type": "xsd:integer" },
"type": "@type",
"id": "@id"
},
"@type": "void:Dataset"
} Here are the results: JSON-LD-Framed.zip |
@ddeboer could you review? |
Thanks @pmaria, looks good to me! What strikes me looking at the JSON-LD is that having separate blank nodes for the same class partition looks overly verbose: "classPartition": [
{
"class": "https://w3id.org/pnv#PersonName",
"entities": "189063"
},
{
"class": "https://w3id.org/pnv#PersonName",
"propertyPartition": {
"distinctValues": "72130",
"entities": "189057",
"property": "https://w3id.org/pnv#baseSurname"
}
},
{
"class": "https://w3id.org/pnv#PersonName",
"propertyPartition": {
"distinctValues": "54198",
"entities": "184846",
"property": "https://w3id.org/pnv#firstName"
}
},
{
"class": "https://w3id.org/pnv#PersonName",
"propertyPartition": {
"distinctValues": "188920",
"entities": "189063",
"property": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label"
}
},
{
"class": "https://w3id.org/pnv#PersonName",
"propertyPartition": {
"distinctValues": "341",
"entities": "34366",
"property": "https://w3id.org/pnv#infix"
}
}, Should we merge those into a single class partition with multiple property partitions? Of course, this is something that should happen inside the pipeline rather than the conversion to JSON-LD. I’m not sure yet what would be the best way to reference blank nodes between isolated analysers. Should we coin URIs for the analyser output instead? |
@ddeboer yes agreed. We could indeed use some repeatable URI generation to group the property partitions under the same class partition. |
Use case: Colonial Heritage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: